Last Updated May 2026

B. Speaks

Senior Mixed-Methods Researcher specializing in AI/ML, Enterprise, Startup, and B2B SaaS. Developing RUXR, a signal-driven rapid research practice.

"Research is formalized curiosity." Attributed to Zora Neale Hurston.

Executive Summary

15+ years turning complex user behavior into product strategy.

I'm a senior mixed-methods UX researcher with fifteen years of experience. I work with people who use complex, high-stakes systems, including data scientists, clinicians, engineers, recruiters, and enterprise operators. I focus on messy human and system problems. I design research to understand them and turn insights into product decisions that ship.

My experience falls into three areas. First, AI and machine learning. I have studied human and AI collaboration since co-creating the Centaur Model of Artificial Intelligence in 2013. Second, enterprise environments. I led global information architecture at ExxonMobil and ran discovery at Regeneron, Penn Medicine, Humana, and Toyota. Third, early-stage B2B SaaS. I co-founded Gigzilla, grew it to $2.5M in revenue, and helped raise $5.5M before exit.

Across all of this, I focus on evidence that drives action, often on tight timelines. I work closely with product, design, engineering, and executive teams. My work ranges from field research with clinicians, to statistical analysis, to facilitating workshops, to communicating insights to investors.

02. Credibility Snapshot

The evidence, at a glance.

15+ years
Mixed-methods UX research across healthcare, AI, enterprise, and B2B SaaS.
500+
User studies across lab, remote, and field settings with both technical and consumer audiences.
Co-creator
Centaur Model of Artificial Intelligence (2013), with Pete Bouchard (IBM Watson) and Syrus Nemat-Nasser (Stanford).
Published
Contributor to the CUE-2 comparative usability study (Molich et al., "Behaviour & Information Technology").
$5.5M
Raised at Gigzilla as co-founder and research lead through exit.
6 wks → 3–5 days
Rapid Research method developed at UserHappy, reducing discovery timelines by up to 90% without lowering evidence quality.
03. Rapid UXR

Rapid UXR (RUXR)

RUXR is a practice I am actively codifying. I built it in the field first and named it after, so earlier descriptions are just earlier snapshots of the same work. The names sharpened. The practice didn't.

At UserHappy, RUXR cut our experimentation cycle from six weeks to three to five days, measured question-to-decision—less than half a sprint. One company, one result, but it proves the point: a research-backed point of view fast enough to greenlight or kill a direction before the build, not a readout filed after the call is already made.

I keep humans on the judgment calls and route the mechanical work to AI. I have built research this way since co-creating the Centaur Model of AI in 2013. The principle is simple. Machines handle computation. Humans handle judgment.

I am tool-agnostic. For this project the product team and I chose a precise pipeline. Perplexity ran deep research. Claude handled reasoning and synthesis. Figma and Figma Make drove rapid prototyping. Cursor coded live interactions when a question turned on real behavior, not a static mock. Around all of it: interviews, moderated sessions, direct observation.

The tools keep it fast. The human in the loop keeps it honest to your users. Knowing which job belongs to the model and which belongs to the expert is the discipline.

RUXR is decision-first. I start from the exact call a team needs to make, work backward to the minimum learning that would move it, and pick methods last. The decision picks the tool, qual or quant. Every signal is sourced and qualified: "three of five users hit the same wall, consistent with the funnel drop-off" is a signal; "users seemed frustrated" is not.

Rigor scales to the decision. Reversible calls move on a strong corroborated signal, and that's most product work. One-way doors get a powered study. The bar moves with the risk; it doesn't drop.

Every cycle produces three linked artifacts by design: a plain-language squad bulletin so the team acts without a decode meeting, a deeper UXR handoff carrying the signal's source, strength, and limits, and an AI-ready markup that preserves structured context so the next researcher or agent inherits the evidence instead of relearning it. Sprints own cadence. RUXR owns a signal pipeline that compounds across cycles instead of resetting.

Teams get continuous signal they can act on, leaders get calls scoped to the risk, and both humans and AI can pick up the work and go fast without losing the thread.

One research cycle produces three linked artifacts: squad bulletin, UXR handoff, and AI-ready markup, which feeds the next cycle.
One research cycle, three linked artifacts. The AI-ready markup feeds the next cycle, so evidence compounds instead of resetting.
04. Method

A mixed-methods practice anchored in three pillars of evidence.

Every design decision needs a clear rationale. My approach is simple. Every recommendation is backed by at least one of three sources: test data, expert opinion, or best practices.

Test data is direct evidence from users doing real tasks. Expert opinion comes from practitioners who have seen the pattern before. Best practices are the lessons that have held up over time.

In practice, I combine qualitative and quantitative methods. I use interviews and contextual inquiry to understand why. I use surveys, behavioral analytics, and statistical analysis to measure what. I use workshops, journey maps, and prioritization frameworks to turn findings into action. The mix changes based on the question. The standard for evidence does not.

Test Data
Usability tests, behavioral analytics, survey results, and statistical analysis of real user behavior.
Expert Opinion
Input from domain experts, senior designers, engineers, and field operators.
Best Practices
Nielsen heuristics, accessibility standards, published research, and validated patterns.
A note on speed

This approach does not require long timelines. Many engagements run in a few weeks, sometimes less. The standard for evidence stays the same. The scope, methods, and synthesis adjust to match the decision at hand.

05. The Brief

The questions I get hired to answer.

Senior research is not a methods checklist. It is working inside strategic ambiguity. These are real questions executives, founders, and product leaders have brought to me. Some are about technology. Most are about people. The case studies that follow show how I answered them.

CEO · AI Startup
We do not have much data, and we have many edge cases with limited data. Machine learning is a necessary part of our stack. How will this affect the user experience?
Cognitive Scientist
We have an amazing algorithm. But for training, it needs a graphical user interface.
CTO · Enterprise SaaS
We have 30 years of data, but we still do everything as a one-off with spreadsheets. Our president wants automation and artificial intelligence. What should we do?
Director of Product
We are redesigning our flagship product. How do we win new customers without alienating existing users?
SVP Product
Our product generates a lot of data, but many customers still export into spreadsheets. Can we add or integrate tools so more of their work happens in our platform?
Data Scientist
We need a new way to visualize information that reduces bias and is more accessible. What could that look like?
Startup Investor
We invested because of the science. Now we need to see the product. Make it so.
Founder · Pre-Revenue
Investors are our main audience right now. The promises we made to get funding are shaping the user experience. How do we reconcile that with what users need?
06. Selected Findings

Five case studies, fifteen years of evidence.

Finding 01 / 2026

UserHappy: Customer Discovery for an AI-Assisted UXR Platform

"What MVP would associations actually pay for?"

Context

Founder Aline Lin had built an early version of a lightweight user-feedback tool. She needed to validate the right wedge into the association market before committing to a rebuild. I led an end-to-end discovery program from scratch. I ran founder interviews to clarify the vision and constraints, two rounds of stakeholder interviews (internal team and external consultants who sell to associations), a competitive landscape review across enterprise platforms and indirect competitors, and structured workshops to converge on an ICP and MVP scope.

Key insight

Associations have deep anecdotal knowledge of their members but almost no behavioral data to validate it. They do not want a research repository. They want push-based, specific, actionable recommendations they can hand to leadership. MARCOM teams at mid-tier trade and professional associations emerged as the best early adopters: under pressure to modernize, burned by past vendors, and operating in the 100 to 1,500 USD/month department-budget window.

Outcome

The team shipped a focused MVP, a micro-tool that captures sentiment and friction at the point of contact, with AI-generated insight cards as the core unit of value. We defined a clear, defensible ICP and a narrow go-to-market wedge the team could use to target its first ten customer conversations.

"Associations have deep anecdotal knowledge. They lack the behavioral data to validate or challenge it. No tools marry the two." External Stakeholder Synthesis, V2
Role
Sr. UX Researcher
Client
UserHappy / Astriata
Methods
Founder interviews · Stakeholder interviews · Competitive analysis · ICP workshops · MVP prioritization
Outcome
Validated ICP · Prioritized MVP scope · Defensible go-to-market wedge
Finding 02 / 2014 to 2017

Zintera: Co-Creating the Centaur Model of Artificial Intelligence

"Can a human-AI cooperative model outperform humans alone, or AI alone, on healthcare audits?"

Context

Zintera was a Samsung-funded startup with an unproven neural network and a single bet: pairing human expertise with machine learning would beat either one alone. As Senior UX Researcher, I led customer discovery and field research alongside Pete Bouchard (Distinguished Engineer, IBM Watson Healthcare) and Dr. Syrus Nemat-Nasser (Stanford). We proposed, and I named, the Centaur Model of Artificial Intelligence: AI handles computation and pattern recognition; humans provide goal-setting, common-sense reasoning, and judgment.

Field research

The work started in the field. I shadowed thirteen nurse practitioners over two months as they audited complex hospital bills, capturing the artifacts they used, the decisions they made, and the data quality problems that slowed them down. I interviewed data scientists, infectious disease experts at Emory, and healthcare operators to map gaps between user mental models and the system's conceptual model. That gap determines whether AI is adopted or rejected.

From findings to product

The research translated directly into product strategy. We designed interfaces that treated trust as a first-class problem, gave human operators clear ways to correct the model and improve accuracy, and grounded use cases in the messy data realities of hospital billing. The first commercial Centaur deployment audited hospital bills for Kaiser Permanente in 2014. Solo human auditors averaged about 80% accuracy on this work and degraded across long shifts. The Centaur pairing held roughly 90% accuracy across full shifts without that fatigue curve, making the performance gain durable rather than peak.

"The power of human and machine far exceeds the power of human or machine alone." Garry Kasparov
Role
Sr. UX Researcher · Director of Product
Client
Zintera (Samsung-funded) · Kaiser Permanente
Methods
Field research · Contextual inquiry · Mental-model interviews · Concept testing · AI/UX co-design
Outcome
First Centaur AI deployment (Kaiser Permanente) · ~90% sustained accuracy vs. ~80% human baseline · Samsung 2.5M USD term sheet
Team
Pete Bouchard (IBM Watson) · Syrus Nemat-Nasser, PhD (Stanford) · Mehrdad Yazdani, PhD (Meta/FB) · William Lennon, PhD (Allen Institute for AI)
General Centaur Architectural Pattern version 1.0 Authors: Pete Bouchard B. Speaks Baselining Data Data Storage Ingestion Function Translation Function Features Engine Features (Vectors) Classification Language Processing Concepts Translation [ TBD... ] Amplifying Output Enhancement Engine Regulations Regulation W Regulation X Regulation Y Regulation Z [ TBD... ] Visualization Panel Human Interaction: Output Review Regulatory Interface Enhance - Modify - Add - Remove Features Management Interface Tune - Modify - Add - Remove Evidence Locker Enhancing Output Training Management Interface Evidence Management Interface Suggest Reject Modify Add Remove Forensic Workbench Training Engine Features Engine Enhancement Engine
Figure 01 / Centaur Architectural Pattern, v1.0 A visual map of the Centaur pattern: AI handles computation and pattern recognition; humans handle judgment and final decisions. AI proposes, humans review and correct, and those corrections train the system. Authored by Pete Bouchard & B. Speaks · Zintera, 2014
Finding 03 / 2023

Penn Medicine: Validating a New Provider Experience

"Does the new information architecture actually match how members think?"

Context

Penn Medicine was rebuilding its provider-facing experience and needed to know whether the new navigation, content groupings, and labels matched users' mental models before committing to engineering. I led a three-phase research program: discovery, solutioning, and validation. Each phase used mixed methods to build evidence before launch.

Solutioning

In the solutioning phase, I ran moderated open card sorting with 18 participants and 50 cards. Sessions were conducted over remote video so I could capture reasoning, not just categorization. I then ran unmoderated closed card sorting in Maze with 20 participants, using categories that emerged from round one. High-agreement categories included Billing & Insurance, Make an Appointment, My Account, Find a Doctor, Research, Locations, and About the Company. Lower-agreement categories revealed overlapping mental models that needed reorganization.

Validation and outcome

Validation included moderated mobile prototype testing with five general healthcare consumers, unmoderated desktop testing with ten more, and a tree test with 20 participants across eight tasks. The work surfaced more than ten usability fixes before launch. These included a patient-stories module users did not trust, a hierarchy issue that buried specialties below dining options, and a Locations card pattern that performed better with icons. The result was a validated top-level navigation and an implementation-ready information architecture.

"I'd want honest reviews of this hospital. I don't want the patient stories on the main page." Jazmin, 36, usability test
Role
Lead UX Researcher
Client
Penn Medicine
Methods
Open and closed card sorting (moderated and unmoderated) · Tree testing · Mobile and desktop usability testing · Preference testing
Outcome
Validated top-level navigation · 10+ pre-launch usability fixes · Implementation-ready information architecture
Finding 04 / 2017

Regeneron: Reinventing Change Control Through Design Thinking

"How do you reinvent change control across QA, Production, Engineering, and Regulatory?"

Context

Regeneron's change control process, owned by QA but touching almost every major division, had become complex, error-prone, and hard to navigate. Leadership needed a way to scope a short-term project without losing sight of the longer-term strategy. I served as workshop facilitator for a two-day discovery engagement with nine cross-functional stakeholders.

Workshop structure

The structure blended contextual research with collaborative innovation games from "Gamestorming" and "Innovation Games." We began by observing a live Change Control Committee meeting to ground the group in real behavior. Participants then worked through Business Process Mapping (storyboarding their narratives), Remembering the Future (defining success at December 2017 and 2018), Personas, Dinosaur Steps (segmenting the process into phases), Speedboat (visualizing pain points as anchors), and a round-robin business-requirements exercise, converging into affinity diagramming and dot voting.

Outcome

The synthesis produced four prioritized themes: Ease of Use, Duplication & Alignment, Reporting, and Originating Activities Visibility. Each was linked to business impact and a future-state opportunity. The recommendation included a cross-functional team structure (Change Control, QRM, RA, Supply Chain Compliance, IT) and a phased approach that started with change control initiation and the directly impacted systems. This work fed directly into the roadmap for the next phase of the engagement.

Role
Business Experience Designer · Workshop Facilitator
Client
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
Methods
Contextual observation · Design thinking · Innovation games (Speedboat, Dinosaur Steps, Remembering the Future) · Affinity diagramming · Dot voting
Outcome
Four prioritized themes · Cross-functional team recommendation · Phased roadmap into solution definition
Finding 05 / 2019 to 2024

Gigzilla: Founder, Research Lead, and Exit

"What workflow gap would frontline workers and skilled trade pros pay to close?"

Context

Gigzilla was a mobile and desktop platform for skilled trade professionals. These included truck drivers, forklift operators, HVAC technicians, and others with certifications that do not fit neatly into LinkedIn. As cofounder and Manager of UX Research, I built the research practice while we built the product. The two grew together.

Research and key insights

I conducted more than 200 remote and in-person user interviews. I facilitated bi-weekly focus groups with two to six participants who reviewed features and clickable prototypes. I also ran continuous usability studies to improve the information architecture and interaction design of the platform. Three insights from this discovery work proved pivotal. Trade workers needed credential portability. Generic job boards did not meet their needs. Community college workforce programs were a powerful distribution channel. Together, these insights moved the product to product-market fit.

Leadership and outcome

I managed and mentored a small UX team. The team included three qualitative researchers, one designer, and one writer. I translated findings into personas, journey maps, and information architecture that the product was built on. I presented user insights and product strategy in concise, executive-ready formats. That work helped secure $5.5M in angel, pre-seed, and seed funding. The company exited after community college workforce programs adopted Gigzilla as a LinkedIn alternative.

Role
Research Lead and Cofounder
Client
Gigzilla
Methods
More than 200 user interviews · Focus groups · Usability studies · Continuous discovery · Personas and journey mapping
Outcome
Product-market fit · $5.5M raised · $2.5M in sales · Exit
Selected clients & engagements
ExxonMobil Global information architecture
Kaiser Permanente AI assisted audits
Penn Medicine Information architecture and usability
Regeneron Discovery workshops and change control
Northrop Grumman Public safety workflows
Toyota Global UX and research
Humana Healthcare member experience
Intel AI and machine learning research
Hillcrest Labs Exploratory user research for consumer media interfaces
Emory University Clinical data visualization
Microsoft Enterprise UX research
SCE Mixed methods research
07. Professional History

Where I've worked.

Senior UX ResearcherUserHappy
Mixed-methods research for an AI-assisted UX research platform: discovery, ICP definition, MVP prioritization, and customer-facing studies.
2026–Present
Lead UX ResearcherHire Squire
Continuous discovery and mixed-methods research for a B2B SaaS recruiting platform serving employers and frontline workers. In-field shadowing of recruiters.
2024–2026
Research Lead and CofounderGigzilla
Built and led the research practice for a mobile + desktop platform serving skilled trade professionals. 200+ interviews. Raised $5.5M; exit after community college adoption.
2019–2024
Lead UX ArchitectSaatchi & Saatchi + Lucid Agency
UX research and strategy across enterprise clients including Intel, Penn Medicine, Southern California Edison, Regeneron, ARC, and SeaWorld.
2017–2019
Senior UX ResearcherZintera
Customer discovery, use case development, and field research at a Samsung-funded AI startup. Co-created the Centaur Model of Artificial Intelligence.
2014–2017
Director of UX · Senior UX DesignerRazorfish
Led UX work for healthcare and enterprise clients including Toyota, ExxonMobil, Humana, and Polo. Owned the global IA for ExxonMobil Worldwide.
2010–2014
08. Publications & Talks

Selected publications and talks.

  • Peer-Reviewed Publication
    Comparative Usability Evaluation (CUE-2)
    Molich, Ede, Kaasgaard & Karyukin · "Behaviour & Information Technology," Vol. 23, No. 1. Contributor, Southern Polytechnic State University team (Carol Barnum, faculty advisor).
  • Seminar / Interaction Design Foundation
    UX + Data Science: A Framework for Collaboration and Creating Fantastic Products
    Talk for the IxDF community on how UX research and data science can co-design AI/ML products.
  • Seminar / Interaction Design Foundation
    How to Effectively Leverage UX Research When Developing AI/ML Products
    Talk drawing on the Centaur Model and a decade of research with technical practitioners.
09. Contact

Let's talk.

I'm open to senior and lead UX research roles, contract engagements, and advisory conversations, especially where AI/ML products, technical users, or B2B SaaS are in the mix.

Location Harrisonburg, Virginia
Availability Open to senior & lead UXR roles
Time Zone Eastern (UTC−5)